tmkf dishes on dicks

Aw man–thanks guys! The more I write, the more I worry about crossing that threshold of derailing the thread or just coming off as really indulgent. But yeah: I think it’s a really worthwhile conversation, and I like the idea of Axe digressions happening in a main thread.

Yeah, I don’t think buying into masculinity (or femininity) actually connects to gender, but I think not having anxiety about gender identification makes it a lot easier to be honest with yourself (and then others) about where you fall on the Kinsey scale.

It’s weird to see the MRA movement emerge out of guys bonding together over gender anxieties. If only they understood that all their complaints (while often valid) are a different aspect of the same gender oppression that disenfranchises women. I just want to scoop them all up and be like, “We’re all in this together guys!” But I think the problem there is prejudice against an othered group (women), and it’s really hard to have empathy or sympathy for a type of person you’ve never actually engaged vulnerably.

I’m a huge Adventure Time fan and butt humor is a huge part of the show. But man, I just never got into that either!

Overall, I think my sense of humor is very verbal. I think most adults like conversational humor, so I don’t think that’s very unique, but maybe I’m limited in that I so strongly prefer it? I don’t really enjoy slapstick at all and never got into the three stooges or the clowning of Harpo Marx.

The exception to this might be that in recent years I’ve realized that I really like strong cartooning. I loved the first season of Regular Show primarily due to funny faces, and I think Kate Beaton is a mediocre artists and a brilliant cartoonist–her pictures are hilarious. Ditto for that dude that does those MGS recap cartoons.

Uncharitable self evaluation: at a young age I internalized a willfull pretension, part of which was deciding that I wouldn’t enjoy base humor.

More charitable: knowing this about myself, I’ve wondered if it also has something to do with gender (I don’t exclusively think through this prism, I swear). I think a big part of being acculturated as feminine is engaging in emotional intelligence–empathy, yes, but also an interest in social status and the currency of information (gossip), and the importance of familial relationships (playing house becomes The Sims becomes soap operas and People Magazine). Men, on the other hand, are acculturated toward varying levels of violence and stoicism in reaction to the consequences of violence (sports and playing war games, dusting yourself off becomes not going to the doctor unless you actually break something). I think slapstick trivializes violence in a way that feels relevant to men, while the “grossness” of toilet humor is identified as non-feminine (more so than explicitly “masculine”) early on, cutting off women from enjoying it. I’ve often wondered if by rejecting the masculine I was offered, I also signaled to myself that I should reject base humor. I know that part of my self construction was based on identifying with “intellectual” male role models, and connecting to the construction of the “90’s Man” as a thing that was good to be. So maybe that all signaled that poo poo jokes were a no no.

All this being said, btw, in many ways I’ve very much a dude. I tend to find male comedians funnier than female comedians, and while I’m grossed out by hyper-violence I still think kung fu and swords and shit are cool. I’m also pretty damn hetero, which I don’t think of as a gender thing, but is definitely conflated with gender identity, both formatively and in our society.

Working in a mostly female office with women who identify with a pretty middle-of-the-road version of femininity (as opposed to hanging with the kids who were gonna go to art school and then hanging with the kids who were in art school) has really shown me, by contrast, my dudeness.

1 Like

I have been on both sides of this, and I have no idea how it reflects on my dudeness. In my past job, as an industrial training developer, I worked in a similarly predominantly female identifying office, to the point where out of the 9 people on the writing team, I was the only one who identified as a male for a long stretch. This wasn’t bad, or problematic, but I do defintiely see where you are coming from on how much it makes you notice your own dude-ness. It’s not a bad thing, really, and it wasn’t a problem working there, but there was certainly a feeling of minor (as in. not super serious or even important) otherness from the general group.

But then my current job is like 90% dudes, which has had a different effect in that I have ended up being pretty good friends with a few of the women in the office. I think largely this is due to me not relating to the masculine norm of the office really well (it’s consulting, and dudes get hyper competitive; yes, even the super nerdy ones who work here), and feeling relatively separated from it. Part of it I think is largely due to my relative skillset being focused in the liberal arts area, whereas most of the guys in the company are STEM focused, and if you’ve ever read any XKCD, you know what STEM dudes think of liberal arts majors. So I end up being friends with the people who don’t get too STEM-y about shit, who also (thanks to the gender imbalances of the education system?) tend to be female identified. I don’t know, it’s weird.

But it has been a pretty constant thing thoughout my life. I am uncomfortable in large groups of men, something I mostly discovered in high school, which meant figuring that out in the middle of 1500 dudes at a single sex school. But simultaneously, I very much feel my status as a dude (and all that entails) when I am in a group of women. This probably has more to do with my own social anxieties than anything else, but whatever.

And thus concludes another moment of booj staring at his navel.

Oh, probably gonna pick this up soon-ish.

Oh yeah: I totally relate to all of that.

I would pretty much never choose to hang out with a large group of feminine women or a large group of masculine men. I don’t feel that comfortable in either, but there’s definitely less of a gulf of understanding with the men. For instance, I’ve talked to Tulpa’s Wife about how I have to catch myself when I get internally frustrated about long conversations about shoes and “Should I buy this skirt?” discussions. Compared to the masculine middle-road I’m pretty clothing-conscious and finicky when shopping, but it’s just not part of my culture to buy a pair of shoes during lunch or have the externalized “should I buy it?” conversation with coworkers for 15 minutes. Even writing about this now, I feel my inner Tim Allen stirring. It’s really hard for me to not think of those sorts of discussions as petty and “stupid,” because I just can’t relate to them.

On the other hand, one of the ways I bond with the male COO at my new office is by talking about phone tech or a new web design trend. It 100% tech hobbyist dad stuff, and 100% the male equivalent of talking about shoes, and of course it doesn’t bother me at all.

Anyway, I’ve talked about this before, but when I’m in a group of dude-dudes, I usually have the experience of “passing.” I can pretty much blend in, not as a dude-dude, but as a special category of nice guy who isn’t awkward.

Definitely my preferred groups are “feminine” dudes and “masculine” women, though. I get along great with the sort of assertive women who end up having gay male best friends. I think we all get the jelly-peanut butter thing that goes on there, so I’ll actually hold back from mansplaining that one.

being a good cartoonist = being a good artist even if the opposite is not necessarily true imo

I don’t think there’s anything wrong with lengthy digression but when it gets to a certain point that we are rapidly approaching i think making a discrete topic is a good idea. for organizational purposes, if nothing else? I wouldn’t mind reading/contributing to a thread specifically about people’s genderfeels. Feel like it’s going to get confusing fast as people play The Witness more and want to talk about it across this other discussion.

also bigheadmode, buddy, you know i like you, but it’s far too late for you to worry about your posts being indulgent. that ship sailed long ago

2 Likes

:B

Yeah, this could all be moved without losing any context, honestly. Where to put it though? Without polling, I’m leery of putting detailed content in the Axe. But there’s no actual General subforum anymore, right?

FYI, I accidentally made a video games & gender thread. Fans of long, indulgent writing will possibly enjoy it, though there is also a cool video to react to.

I think we’re seeing how I react to being in a foreign country with no real friends.

Input IS General.

I think I am the only heternormative cisdude who posts on sb any more. I am at peace.

(note this post is bullshit)

2 Likes

The last cisdude is in captivity. The galaxy is at peace.

4 Likes

I can probably out-hetero you

Let’s not.

1 Like

the genderweirds shall inherit the games

or at least you’d think that looking at my twitter feed

1 Like

Look guys, we all know that Cuba is the most privileged member of the SB community and shrug is the most hetero.

Felix, you might be second at both.

But I dunno: have you seen wasted potential’s sideburns?

Wait. Did Cuba join Discourse? Oh man, did we lose him?

Cuba is Father.Torque just above you

Whoa. That…reframes things. I guess because of the name I was just assuming it was Elder Toups or someone.

The fact that you could not instantly identify me by posting style is hilarious

Or love of Full Throttle

1 Like

tmkf has a v. heteronormative concept of what constitutes hetero itt imo fyi

1 Like

Live by the Shrug, Die by the Shrug

It’s kind of bizarre, right? I think it’s because the name, title, and profile pic just seemed so un-you to me.

One eventually has to embrace one’s dadditude.