Robot: You have 20 seconds to comply ("AI")

The point is this theory starts from the premise that LLMs have knowledge and the capacity to reason to prove that they have knowledge and the capacity to reason. This is not how you prove anything. Their experiment literally has the LLM evaluating its own output. This is just a slightly less cringe version of that cajun discordian google employee.

10 Likes
5 Likes

on one hand, lmao my day job is supporting developers so Copilot falls squarely in our wheelhouse. my boss has been actively looking for people interested in trialling it to see if it’s worth subscribing to. I think it’s a load of crap

on the other hand, I can’t share this article else look like a sneering stick-in-the-mud, back in my day we wrote bash scripts by hand both ways

2 Likes

i have cemented my place as a sneering stick in the mud, personally, and people have responded surprisingly well. turns out a lot of people feel similarly: skeptical but scared of being perceived as against change.

3 Likes

Was there ever a resolution to the whole ‘this code you trained your ai with is under a copyright license’ problem? I thought that would nip this whole fad in the bud

1 Like

I have A Reputation but also get a lot of traction discussing this and Ludditism with one of the data scientists who is more than happy to argue against AI

2 Likes

:sickos:

18 Likes

Shocking! I wonder what the next big grift will be. Maybe quantum computing?

6 Likes

not obviously socially corrosive enough. i’m thinking autonomous home defense systems

7 Likes

or fully automated electronic managers making inroads into more industries, maybe like a turnkey version of what amazon workers have to put up with?

4 Likes

Maybe they can go full Oryx and Crake and get really into monetizing genotypes and doing weird patented gene splicing. You know, try to subsume as much of the medical industry into the tech industry as possible.

“The Internet of Beings”

10 Likes

Start with pets. Designer pets are a lot more palatable to the public than designer humans, which you can always introduce later on down the line after people get used to designing their next dog or cat.

7 Likes

we already have literal ‘designer breeds’

5 Likes

and yet no one is charging licensing fees for their genes. money on the table!

9 Likes
14 Likes

The event I had to work today was a local film maker showing off the first chunk of the documentary hes trying to crowd fund. He had some good interviews but on top of one of the interviewee’s audio being totally out of sync like 80% of what was on screen were photograph style AI art of historical scenes, primarily of indigenous people. I know first hand finding available and good visuals that themselves arent iffy sketches and paintings that were made by Europeans is pretty damn hard but phoneying up images a population that has a long history of being misrepresented aint the way to do it. Plus I’m sure whatever they were using was trained on like bootleg Harley Davidson shirts off of eBay and Daniel Day Lewis.

6 Likes
1 Like

This shit drives me nuts, a bunch of YT video essayists have started being like “oh, I can just generate relevant looking AI art to throw up on the screen while I talk about stuff” and it always looks like complete garbage, especially if they’re talking about historical events because they’ll just generate art based on paintings/drawings of that time period only because it’s AI, it’ll inevitably throw in a really obvious anachronism that nobody catches because nobody cares. Just the absolute laziest bone-stupid approach, “ooooh it’s free content”, you’d be better off with just a solid color background you’re talking over, you dunces.

9 Likes

yeah i hate this, i unsubscribed from a channel that posts dwarf fortress gameplay footage because of the gross ai art thumbnails

4 Likes

thought this was going to be a site which made something like this:

1 Like