It’s almost worse that a buddy of mine got into a stress test so I got to play it for like 5 hours ;_;
It’s so good D:
1 Like
so that’s what my friends are complaining about
but when is someone gonna make a new gex from this thing
3 Likes
What’s stopping you?
http://www.geek.com/games/republican-congressman-spends-1302-of-campaign-funds-on-steam-1651576/
I’d hang with this congressman
1 Like
What did Fear Effect play like anyway? All I know about it is lesbians.
3 Likes
I just feel like pointing out that every game mentioned in this post has a character who is an archer and a character who is shorter than normal and drives a mech
Meanwhile, future GOTY coming through
1 Like
It was basically Resident Evil with more cutscenes and ghosts sometimes.
I don’t see the appeal. It looks so stiff and janky. 
1 Like
Oh jesus, that looks horrific.
And lesbians. Can’t forget that.
If it’s an RE clone, what would a 2016 sequel even look like? A thirps, or something weirder?
Didn’t a Fear Effect game have a character getting eaten out by a cockroach or am I thinking of Galaxy of Terror
…don’t look at me like that
1 Like
Neptunia vs SEGA Hard Girls is coming west to Vita.
Only reason I’m bringing it up though is because in the European version Dreamcast-tan will be recoloured blue
Where’s the Cool Kids SEGA thread?
1 Like
what the fuck is this bullshit censorship
5 Likes
I got into the battleborn beta… it was horrible.
edit: reminding me of that made me depressed. So I ate an entire chocolate bar. It was so bad I have to eat my feelings.
I think the optimistic take on this is that they’re planning on doing this themselves. Everquest launched a “progression server” recently that runs from the launch version on an accelerated patching schedule – I think every month nets a historical “major revision”.
Eurogamer cites the WoW server as having 150k users; definitely large enough to summon the corporate eye. Coopting this desire would be the smart thing to do (even better: having this ready to announce in the next few days to immediately suck up that energy).
it’d sure be swell if self-eating nostalgic capitalism legitimately solved some of our game preservation issues with online games
[quote=“BustedAstromech, post:901, topic:197, full:true”]Eurogamer cites the WoW server as having 150k users; definitely large enough to summon the corporate eye. Coopting this desire would be the smart thing to do (even better: having this ready to announce in the next few days to immediately suck up that energy).
it’d sure be swell if self-eating nostalgic capitalism legitimately solved some of our game preservation issues with online games
[/quote]
How many of those players would convert to paid subscribers on a legacy server though? Let’s say 10% do at 15$/month, it’s 2.7M$ a year for Blizzard. Is that worth the cost of maintenance? What about if 7.5% of those convert to regular WoW subscribers when the private one is shut down even in the absence of anything special delivered for them anyway? I think business logic might cut against preservation here. (But Everquest didn’t think so, obviously – Blizzard is probably closely monitoring how well that is working out for them before they make the decision.)
Well that’s neat and all but doesn’t do me much-
Windows PCs
!!
I am pleased.