I’m 35 and we were a Zelda 2/Mario 2 family, but not at the time of release. Those games came out in the 80s but it was 1990/91 before we got them. Probably because we didn’t buy a lot of games, much less new games, we went to the mom and pop video rental places regularly. Back then they were everywhere and occasionally would sell old stock so a couple of times for Christmas we got a swath of game store cartridges.
Among them came Simon’s Quest but not Castlevania. So my first Castlevania was Simon’s Quest. Now I think the reason I never saw the original Castlevania until I was much older and in high school was because maybe back in the day people who had played Castlevania were put off by how different Simon’s Quest was and returned it to the video stores or sold it off more frequently than Castlevania.
I don’t know. But for a minute there as a young kid who played primarily NES games I developed the impression that a sequel to a game was just going to be really different as a matter of course. See also NES TMNT and the sequel which was based on the arcade version. Totally different games. Now they’ve figured out that people flip out if you release a sequel and it’s not sufficiently similar to the previous game.
But yes, Zelda 2 is great though I didn’t realize it at the time. To me back then it was just different but still a fun game. Same with Mario 2. As I got older and developed taste my early opinions were that the originals were better than the sequels until I learned that that was a silly way of looking at things and they could both be really good but for different reasons.