Scorsese doubles down

i think saying “oh it could’ve been anything!” is reductive. like its not a coincidence these movies became insanely popular post-9/11, a lot of people suddenly became aware the world is uncomfortable and complicated and superhero shit is practically primed to take advantage of that because its all clear cut, simple narratives, simple problems, and simple resolutions.

theres something to be said about other childrens shit (liberals love harry potter for example) but superhero films definitely have the widest appeal

3 Likes

this thread has reached the point where I need to mention I really like Ang Lee’s Hulk

2 Likes

I don’t think he could say anything to keep the raging internet nerds at bay tho

Disney would have desired domination with anything, yes. If they or someone else could’ve done it with John Carter or Independence Day, they would’ve done it, sure. But they didn’t. Marvel is what happened, and thus Marvel is what must be talked about, along with the entire specific MCU strategy. There are particular things in the films themselves and the franchise container that matter. The texts aren’t not part of this. Industry is bound up with the things it produces.

Which is to say it’s not just a slam on blockbuster filmmaking. The contemporary franchise film, and no one is doing it in quite the way Marvel has, has honed the comforting thrum of week-to-week television with hyper-expensive pyrotechnics and the world’s most fuckable people.

There’s no risk, no danger, no daring–which is exactly what Scorsese is on about. It’s not even an anti-blockbuster position and definitely not an anti-genre picture or anti-popularity stance, I don’t believe. He’s referring to developments over the last 20 years, specifically. As Scorsese points out, there are elements of what he recognizes as cinema within the contemporary franchise film, but they’ve eliminated, well, “revelation, mystery or genuine emotional danger.”

At best they contain referential facsimiles of the movies that brought those things to the table in the first place. This is not at all unrelated to the rise of brilliant YouTube video “criticism” that is largely about explaining plot threads and identifying shots that look like references to other, better, actual films.

8 Likes

Yeah, I know he won’t, but I kinda wish we could look forward to Scorsese trolling these dorks every few months until he dies a la Ebert.

2 Likes

That will be a marvelous thing indeed

3 Likes

Gamers interrupting talkback sessions at Cannes to tell the director of the Last Temptation of Christ to play BioShock because it has themes

9 Likes

i actually think the current wave of super hero movies, esp. the marvel ones, are more like post- post-9/11. it’s like a reactionary snapping of the jaws at the idea that pop culture is supposed to make us think about the consequences of trauma.

i mean look at how mad people got at zack snyder when he made super man do 9/11. it’s a more exciting fantasy if our catastrophes come in the form of gigantic purple aliens doing magic tricks on the cosmos.

5 Likes

lol what about superman doing 911

1 Like

the climax of man of steel is all about superman destroying metropolis in order to catch the bad alien, then he snaps his neck in front of school children or something like this

then batman vs superman is all about how batman needs to kill superman before he he causes any more destruction

it’s like a godzilla movie where superman is godzilla

i mean, i still think they kind of suck, but … it’s very “post 9/11”

i know i’ve made this point before, but the sam raimi spider-man is the last ‘pre-9/11’ movie, and the villain of it is an evil industrial arms manufacturer

iron man is about the moral redemption of an evil industrial arms manufacturer

idk

14 Likes

Sometimes I think I should see the Zack Snyder superhero things

and then I remember that there are Ozu and Lubitsch films I’ll probably never even get around to

2 Likes

in retrospect i think the core concept of batman v superman is actually great

and yeah ben affleck is perfectly cast as bruce wayne

the problem is just that the movie gets so bogged down with unnecessary stuff (e.g. wonderwoman, this giant cgi troll thing?) that it distracts you from its great premise, and the resolution of the conflict between batman and superman is so ridiculous that it just deflates the whole thing

the biggest thing that irritates me about hardcore marvel movie fans is they think i have to fucking see the movies to know i dont like them

(no one here is doing this)

5 Likes

i don’t want to fuck any of these goons tbh

1 Like

I used to be really big into watching most of the big Hollywood films, just to stay abreast of what was going on in film and pop culture. I’d see just about anything.

Without knowing anything about the plans for the Marvel Cinematic Universe, I was walking to the parking lot with my friends after Iron Man (Jon Favreau, 2008), and announced “I think I’m done with this whole watching movies just for cultural literacy thing.” I really didn’t like the movie, though it also wasn’t the worst thing ever, but I just decided that it was too bland to be wasting my time with.

It feels remarkably prescient. Maybe it was.

It’s bullshit that Jon Favreau gets to keep making movies. But also he’s the perfect bland visionless director who can run a shoot for Disney.

3 Likes

In conclusion Martin Scorsese loves a fresh KFC double down, as iconic an American product as his own esteemed wares

3 Likes

I don’t either, but I don’t want to watch these either. But apparently almost everyone on Earth wants to fuck Robert Downey Jr. or Mark Ruffalo or at least wants them to fuck each other. It’s not about what I want.

(okay, I’ve always had a crush on Natalie Portman)

i think the first wave of marvel movies are definitely post 9/11 but at this point yes I would agree with you

they put Julie Delpy in one of the avengers movies for like two minutes and I felt seen

2 Likes

14 Likes