Yeah I completely agree. Reading about it, nothing convinced me that anything they were saying wasn’t full of hot air.
And their two examples of like, thoughts being ‘Traditionalist’ (misogynist) and ‘Libertarian’ (likes nice things and money) were…I dunno kinda weird things to show off as the main example.
And the whole bit about how ‘Men and women would be written differently’ is the kind of thing that can either mean ‘wow, I wonder what thoughtful differences there would be’ to ‘jesus christicle on a bicycle dude is this what you think about women’?
But nothing in the article definitively indicated that. Just a lotta stuff that makes me concerned from what that shit can mean.
You’re incredibly fragile and can’t really Rambo around without being shredded, so caution and tactics and flanking count for a lot, which is where ordering your people around on the tactical map comes in
The joy of M&B lies in how little tactical control you have over your troops combined with the awesomeness of the melee and mounted combat, so it remains to be seen if this can capture the same magic
I’m curious if there’s a mid-point between classic Rainbow Six squad commands and personal fragility, and Mount & Blade’s army control. I think the bad case is it ending up like modern Far Cry, with passable but unclear swarming from both AI sides.
I don’t like this new Galarian thing in Pokemon because every time I see something about a new Galarian [Pokemon name] I think it’s actually about a new Galerians game.
